I ran an analysis the same way I run my report cohort analysis on pervaers.com.
It turns out there were a couple of what looked like bad batches in there (just a few really). However those weren't the ones you'd expect by looking at the number of reports before age adjustment etc.
Observation M: Severity Disparity - Being that ONLY INITIAL REPORTS are made public, even though CDC/VAERS continues to collect data, it would stand to reason that perm disability would take longer to report/diagnose, and there for have lower reporting rates? https://imgur.com/yACUYpu
Good point, but VAERS data is all we have, right? Surely, with this approach, real world rates must be higher than reported, but since all ones are initial reports, the basis for reporter's judgement was the same for the most frequently reported batches and the rest. Thus there must be a disparity in the same direction in actually occurred events anyway. Or am I missing something?
I ran an analysis the same way I run my report cohort analysis on pervaers.com.
It turns out there were a couple of what looked like bad batches in there (just a few really). However those weren't the ones you'd expect by looking at the number of reports before age adjustment etc.
I think it's a dead end.
Observation M: Severity Disparity - Being that ONLY INITIAL REPORTS are made public, even though CDC/VAERS continues to collect data, it would stand to reason that perm disability would take longer to report/diagnose, and there for have lower reporting rates? https://imgur.com/yACUYpu
Good point, but VAERS data is all we have, right? Surely, with this approach, real world rates must be higher than reported, but since all ones are initial reports, the basis for reporter's judgement was the same for the most frequently reported batches and the rest. Thus there must be a disparity in the same direction in actually occurred events anyway. Or am I missing something?